US Military tests new bunker buster

Katyusha · Post by **Katyusha** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:47 am

So ehm... anyone got spare shovels? Time to make your fallout shelters extra deep.

*Would love to see what it would do to an unwanted relative's place...*

bluemercury · Post by **bluemercury** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:05 pm

a bomb for every type of enemy or relative. modern tech put to good use

Kilocmdr Lin · Post by **Kilocmdr Lin** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:23 pm

Katyusha wrote:
*Would love to see what it would do to an unwanted relative's place...*

No I would recommend the MOAB, a penetrator would go deep but leave little in the way of surface destruction.

Sir Sefirot · Post by **Sir Sefirot** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:58 pm

Well, looks like the russians were envious

Kilocmdr Lin · Post by **Kilocmdr Lin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:04 am

Sir Sefirot wrote:Well, looks like the russians were envious

well don't you know that the cold war was a international contest to see who had the bigger gun.

Post by **Kei** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 pm

The biggest gun...

Kilocmdr Lin · Post by **Kilocmdr Lin** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:30 am

but not the smartest.
the howitzer, "atomic annie" as it was known, was with in the fall-out range for the shells it fired.

Sir Sefirot · Post by **Sir Sefirot** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:42 am

That's why ICBMs exist

Kilocmdr Lin · Post by **Kilocmdr Lin** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:56 pm

No ICBMs exist because the yield of that shell was only kiloton, all warheads in ICBMs are megaton yield class.
Also the shipping cost on getting that weapon to Russia was nuts.

Project Haruhi

US Military tests new bunker buster

US Military tests new bunker buster

Re: US Military tests new bunker buster

Who is online