Page 1 of 1

US Military tests new bunker buster

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:47 am
by Katyusha
*Click Me :D

So ehm... anyone got spare shovels? Time to make your fallout shelters extra deep.

*Would love to see what it would do to an unwanted relative's place...*

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:05 pm
by bluemercury
a bomb for every type of enemy or relative. modern tech put to good use

Re: US Military tests new bunker buster

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:23 pm
by Kilocmdr Lin
Katyusha wrote:
*Would love to see what it would do to an unwanted relative's place...*
No I would recommend the MOAB, a penetrator would go deep but leave little in the way of surface destruction.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:58 pm
by Sir Sefirot
Well, looks like the russians were envious :lol:

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:04 am
by Kilocmdr Lin
Sir Sefirot wrote:Well, looks like the russians were envious :lol:
well don't you know that the cold war was a international contest to see who had the bigger gun.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 pm
by Kei
The biggest gun...

Image

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:30 am
by Kilocmdr Lin
but not the smartest.
the howitzer, "atomic annie" as it was known, was with in the fall-out range for the shells it fired. :roll:

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:42 am
by Sir Sefirot
That's why ICBMs exist :P

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:56 pm
by Kilocmdr Lin
No ICBMs exist because the yield of that shell was only kiloton, all warheads in ICBMs are megaton yield class.
Also the shipping cost on getting that weapon to Russia was nuts.

:roll: