Project Haruhi

Clicky Clicky

Sometimes, arn't you glad you arn't in Japan?

holy smokes! man that crazy.

.......He's drunk?

Less drunk, more homicidal... tweaked in the head.

after that he fell down and die by a heart attack. The police is still investigating this case...

Where'd you hear THAT? *is suspicious*

he aint dead.
'Later that afternoon, the police arrested a 25-year-old male named Tomohiro Katō on suspicion of attempted murder by "stabbing one person after another with a knife."'

http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/20 ... -akihabara

Lazy really aughta stop mixing thoughts and facts =/


Either that or it was a rather good death note joke o.o

Lazy wouldn't do that. Its Lazy. If he did, all we know and love about him would be wrong. Is love the right word?

i was talking a death note joke....Kira can control people before they die right? and some of u guys r falling for it

But Kira wouldn't have him slash people left right and center =3

Woah. Lazy was telling a joke... Thats my whole perspective of my reality out the window. Anyway. I heard ont news that the dude who did it purposefully went there to kill people... How sadistic's that?

To make its as a usual killing spree ofcourse

Joel: There was a man, no idea who/where, that climbed his college roof with a gun. He shot at people until the police killed him. He had left a suicide note explaining why he wanted to die... and why he wanted to take numerous, random people with him.

Well if its was in the war then i call him a hero but this, i say he just want friends coming with him. Wat a scum!

Even in a war, such a thing wouldn't be acceptable. Killing random non-combatants is still against the laws of war.

...its whats causes the wars in the first place

Katyusha wrote:Even in a war, such a thing wouldn't be acceptable. Killing random non-combatants is still against the laws of war.

nah wat i say is take your enemy with u before u die

lazysunside wrote:Well if its was in the war then i call him a hero but this, i say he just want friends coming with him. Wat a scum!

Heroes save people.

war heroes kill enemies

I could go on and on about Archer's speech about heroism being selfish, but if you've found an MoH awardee since he Second World War just for killing an armed enemy, then please do show.

Whatever. Anyone under the impression all you need to do to be a war hero is "Kill lots of badguys." is deluded.

nobodies are bad guys in the war. If u think the enemies are bad guys then ure bad guys too to them. A hero is the one who won battles and serve his country wells. No matter he is alive or not. Its hard for me to say it all since i'm lazy after one night watch drama

I do believe someone's reality check just bounced.

Do you consider those who killed so many people and destroyed the land of Vietnam, or those who fought for Hitler's ideals, 'heroes'?

The people who get called heroes are those that, while under those commands only kill to protect those under fire alongside them. Those that kill only when commanded, and regret it afterwards.

When conscription was introduced in England there were those that refused for moral reasons. The 'conscientious objectors', who spent the war in prison, are far more of a hero. they're remembered as a minority. That's saying a lot.

Soldiers are remembered as soldiers... people who'll kill for money and their country. they aren't remembered as merciful men of honour.

i'll withraw from this talk. I'm so tired today, u guys can have fun around with it

Pandemonium wrote:Do you consider those who killed so many people and destroyed the land of Vietnam, or those who fought for Hitler's ideals, 'heroes'?

The people who get called heroes are those that, while under those commands only kill to protect those under fire alongside them. Those that kill only when commanded, and regret it afterwards.

When conscription was introduced in England there were those that refused for moral reasons. The 'conscientious objectors', who spent the war in prison, are far more of a hero. they're remembered as a minority. That's saying a lot.

Soldiers are remembered as soldiers... people who'll kill for money and their country. they aren't remembered as merciful men of honour.

And on the opposite side of a coin, as much as I dislike random warmongering, I also despite conscientious objectors, perhaps more so.

Oh? why exactly?

[On a random note... i was just added on facebook by Haruhi (Or someone pretending to be her, anyway) o.o

...I've attempted to turn her into a vampire. Win.]

Anyone who is incapable of taking action when the need arises, is, personally, worse than anyone who jumps off impulsively. It's failure by inaction, an inability to think beyond one's self. I could go on and on with more reasons, but this is already off topic.

Personally, i believe it's not what you say. The conscientious objectors put across what they wanted to say, at their own risk. They are known for what they did... they have done more than any soldier did, at the time. They stood out.

...and yeah... rather off-topic

Pandemonium wrote:Do you consider those who killed so many people and destroyed the land of Vietnam, or those who fought for Hitler's ideals, 'heroes'?

The people who get called heroes are those that, while under those commands only kill to protect those under fire alongside them. Those that kill only when commanded, and regret it afterwards.

When conscription was introduced in England there were those that refused for moral reasons. The 'conscientious objectors', who spent the war in prison, are far more of a hero. they're remembered as a minority. That's saying a lot.

Soldiers are remembered as soldiers... people who'll kill for money and their country. they aren't remembered as merciful men of honour.

If we had a reputation system on here, I'd +1 you for this post.

If everyone on both sides goes to war because they're conscripted, we get bloody wars. If everyone goes to prison instead, well... guess. I believe a real 'hero' would be someone who sets an example of how to better the world by following it.