36 multi-choice questions; 4 choices, 9 possible results so it's not necessarily obvious.
All hypothetical situations... think it through best you can!
Also... spoiler for length please.
Chaotic Evil for me:
Spoiler:
A chaotic evil character does whatever his greed, hatred, and lust for destruction drive him to do. He is hot-tempered, vicious, arbitrarily violent, and unpredictable. If he is simply out for whatever he can get, he is ruthless and brutal. If he is committed to the spread of evil and chaos, he is even worse. Thankfully, his plans are haphazard, and any groups he joins or forms are poorly organized. Typically, chaotic evil people can be made to work together only by force, and their leader lasts only as long as he can thwart attempts to topple or assassinate him. Chaotic evil is sometimes called demonic because demons are the epitome of chaotic evil. Chaotic evil is the best alignment you can be because combines self-interest and pure freedom. However, chaotic evil can be a dangerous alignment because it represents the destruction not only of beauty and life but also of the order on which beauty and life depend.
Neutral Good- A neutral good character does the best that a good person can do. He is devoted to helping others. He works with kings and magistrates but does not feel beholden to them. Neutral good is the best alignment you can be because it means doing what is good without bias for or against order. However, neutral good can be a dangerous alignment because because it advances mediocrity by limiting the actions of the truly capable.
I don't even understand, limited connection? that implies slow speed...?
but lazy, you've been inside these forums doing a myriad of activities for ages now, what's suddenly changed?
True Neutral- A true neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. He doesn't feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most true neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil after all, he would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, he's not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some true neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. True neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion. However, true neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it represents apathy, indifference, and a lack of conviction.
Law & Chaos:
Law ----- XXXXX (5)
Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXX (13)
Chaos --- XXXXXXXX (8)
Good & Evil:
Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXX (12)
Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXX (13)
Evil ---- XXX (3)
Last edited by Taiga on Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:Edited to shorten. Too many of that would make scrolling down rather a chore.
F'a Bale, carsarh gereulacr. Gereulach éü,Sicé dozzote dar carsarr factina Farer dozzoth, R'a sotle nilora rÿal dar üaiponéra.
depends. 'free spirit' is a relative measure....
i define 'free' by being able to get in my car and drive. shami might think the same thing about flying
The chaotic alignments are those considered free. Do whatever they wish to, when they want.
Lawful-based alignments follow -well- laws. Set by the others or themselves they follow them to their own ends. Think serial killers who follow strict patterns. Dexter (as in... from the show ofd the same name) is most likely Lawful Neutral- does good but in a questionable way, following direct patterns.
Neutral does what has to be done. restricted only when necissary... but still restricted.
Not really, alignments are more guidelines than actual rules. I just love to see a paladin kill children for no reason, there is just something artistic about it don't you think?
F'a Bale, carsarh gereulacr. Gereulach éü,Sicé dozzote dar carsarr factina Farer dozzoth, R'a sotle nilora rÿal dar üaiponéra.
You realise that 'Not really, alignments are more guidelines than actual rules.', besides destroying an epic quote, makes no sense at all, right?
A Paladin just might. As lawful evil a paladin works by their own judgement... but that could be EXTREMELY strict. An unchristened child doesn't go to heaven, remember?